Total Commodity Programs in Grand Forks County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 130
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Grand Forks County, North Dakota totaled $823,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hoverson Brothers | Larimore, ND 58251 | $125,378 |
2 | 4g Farms Llp | Oslo, MN 56744 | $38,809 |
3 | Burkland Farms | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $32,758 |
4 | David & Brenda Staveteig Farms | Thompson, ND 58278 | $27,832 |
5 | Dorothy Marie Farrell | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $25,791 |
6 | Karley Farm Jv | Gilby, ND 58235 | $20,856 |
7 | Jenna L Kyllo | Mccanna, ND 58251 | $20,476 |
8 | Tammy Lynn Hofer | Northwood, ND 58267 | $19,498 |
9 | Darrin Joseph Schmidt | Niagara, ND 58266 | $18,331 |
10 | Constance Marie Klava-finnie | Emerado, ND 58228 | $16,185 |
11 | Kyle Robert Kleven | Larimore, ND 58251 | $15,565 |
12 | Eastvold Family Farms Llp | Northwood, ND 58267 | $15,219 |
13 | Candace Rae Nissen | Larimore, ND 58251 | $13,527 |
14 | Sandra Lynn Kyllo | Larimore, ND 58251 | $12,145 |
15 | William James Farrell | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $11,875 |
16 | Gregory Wood Skibicki | Fordville, ND 58231 | $11,875 |
17 | Gerald Oliver Kjorvestad | Thompson, ND 58278 | $11,875 |
18 | Mark Allen Sletten | Hatton, ND 58240 | $11,875 |
19 | Jay Roland Nissen | Larimore, ND 58251 | $11,875 |
20 | Keith D Drees | Emerado, ND 58228 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>