Farm Subsidy information
Grand Forks County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Grand Forks County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,078
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Forks County, North Dakota totaled $77,294,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $268,199 | |
22 | Brian Larry Tweten | Thompson, ND 58278 | $263,205 |
23 | David Lee Adams | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $256,230 |
24 | Wade Terrance Stadstad | Emerado, ND 58228 | $253,755 |
25 | Sannes Farms Ltd | Thompson, ND 58278 | $249,712 |
26 | Craig Jones Inc | Oslo, MN 56744 | $248,253 |
27 | John Peter Buck | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $245,344 |
28 | Gregory George Aarhus | Emerado, ND 58228 | $238,339 |
29 | Timothy S Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $227,347 |
30 | Mark Todd Wiegandt | Mccanna, ND 58251 | $224,429 |
31 | Gravdahl Farms Inc | Northwood, ND 58267 | $223,730 |
32 | Nicole Lynn Korsmo | Northwood, ND 58267 | $223,250 |
33 | Gregory Wood Skibicki | Fordville, ND 58231 | $222,637 |
34 | Jared Curtis Hagert | Emerado, ND 58228 | $216,503 |
35 | Nicholas E Adams | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $215,141 |
36 | Brent Glenn Schmitz | Mekinock, ND 58258 | $212,810 |
37 | Terry Allen Ellingson | Dahlen, ND 58224 | $209,884 |
38 | Tyler James Stover | Larimore, ND 58251 | $208,685 |
39 | Ryan B Gratton | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $203,481 |
40 | David & Brenda Staveteig Farms | Thompson, ND 58278 | $201,086 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”