Farm Subsidy information
Grand Forks County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Grand Forks County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,078
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Forks County, North Dakota totaled $77,294,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeffrey Kent Kyllo | Larimore, ND 58251 | $158,221 |
62 | Clint Georgeson | Niagara, ND 58266 | $157,974 |
63 | Conrad Louis Dietzler | Larimore, ND 58251 | $157,883 |
64 | Don T Bushaw | Manvel, ND 58256 | $157,397 |
65 | Thomas Leonard Mcmahon | Mccanna, ND 58251 | $154,629 |
66 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $153,874 |
67 | Peter Landman Welte | Niagara, ND 58266 | $153,722 |
68 | Douglas Alan Perkins | Aneta, ND 58212 | $153,559 |
69 | Aaron J Smestad | Niagara, ND 58266 | $150,184 |
70 | Larry Thomas Olson | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $149,739 |
71 | Jw Scott Farm | Gilby, ND 58235 | $148,127 |
72 | R P Farms Inc | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $146,977 |
73 | Michael Hunt | Warwick, ND 58381 | $146,489 |
74 | Eastvold Family Farms Llp | Northwood, ND 58267 | $146,469 |
75 | Dbp Farms Inc | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $146,007 |
76 | Cole Andrew Schmidt | Larimore, ND 58251 | $145,330 |
77 | Larry Nord | Gilby, ND 58235 | $142,881 |
78 | Reinhold Farms LLC | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $142,721 |
79 | Bradley Wayne Warnke | Emerado, ND 58228 | $142,206 |
80 | Virgil John Duncklee | Emerado, ND 58228 | $139,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”