Total Conservation Programs in Grand Forks County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 744
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grand Forks County, North Dakota totaled $4,246,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Paul E Tenneson | Marshall, MN 56258 | $10,771 |
102 | Sherri Hart | Parker, CO 80134 | $10,739 |
103 | Paul J Clemetson | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $10,668 |
104 | Darrell H & Janice M Jodock Revocable Trust | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $10,323 |
105 | Mary Ann Peterson Sponsler | Long Lake, MN 55356 | $10,173 |
106 | Gregory Lee Mcmahon | Larimore, ND 58251 | $10,160 |
107 | James C Larsgaard | Richmond, KY 40475 | $10,157 |
108 | E Duncklee Family Trust | Emerado, ND 58228 | $10,146 |
109 | Joy K Ryan | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $9,927 |
110 | Kent Alisen Krogstad | Hatton, ND 58240 | $9,923 |
111 | Elton V Brekke | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $9,898 |
112 | Dale Trosen | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $9,893 |
113 | Laverne Kelly | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $9,887 |
114 | Sandra Ovind | Emerado, ND 58228 | $9,801 |
115 | Eric Stanislowski | Minto, ND 58261 | $9,800 |
116 | Sharon E Delano | Hatton, ND 58240 | $9,794 |
117 | Joy Trust | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $9,788 |
118 | Mary Jane Brenna | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $9,759 |
119 | Mary Mulligan Cox | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $9,709 |
120 | Kathleen Mulligan-widell | Pillager, MN 56473 | $9,709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”