Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Grand Forks County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 539
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Grand Forks County, North Dakota totaled $37,658,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Nicholas E Adams | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $189,132 |
42 | Timothy S Ness | Hatton, ND 58240 | $188,131 |
43 | Ron & Nick Adams Farms | Reynolds, ND 58275 | $187,876 |
44 | Mark Allen Sletten | Hatton, ND 58240 | $187,602 |
45 | Larry Thomas Olson | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $178,682 |
46 | Gary Wayne Gonitzke | Inkster, ND 58244 | $177,996 |
47 | Mark David Dickson | Gilby, ND 58235 | $177,949 |
48 | Michael Lee | Thompson, ND 58278 | $176,579 |
49 | Thomas Joseph Metz | Northwood, ND 58267 | $176,536 |
50 | William James Farrell | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $176,257 |
51 | Dorothy Marie Farrell | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $176,257 |
52 | David & Brenda Staveteig Farms | Thompson, ND 58278 | $173,236 |
53 | Ryan Dale Benson | Arvilla, ND 58214 | $172,989 |
54 | Constance Marie Klava | Emerado, ND 58228 | $171,883 |
55 | Jesse Morten | Larimore, ND 58251 | $171,480 |
56 | Cronquist Farm | Gilby, ND 58235 | $169,148 |
57 | Benjamin Joseph Capp | Mccanna, ND 58251 | $165,986 |
58 | Tyler James Stover | Larimore, ND 58251 | $164,836 |
59 | Bradford Thomas Matteson | Inkster, ND 58233 | $163,910 |
60 | Drees Farming Assn | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $163,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”