Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Grant County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 408
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $16,593,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cynthia Rae Kuntz | Elgin, ND 58533 | $108,661 |
42 | Lincoln Roth | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $107,745 |
43 | Matthew J Haase | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $106,474 |
44 | Chester Reinhold Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $106,118 |
45 | Brian Lynn Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $103,211 |
46 | Franks 4u Ranch Llp | Shields, ND 58569 | $102,925 |
47 | Christopher Carl Zimmerman | Elgin, ND 58533 | $102,839 |
48 | Preston Joseph Stewart | Carson, ND 58529 | $102,301 |
49 | Jake Mark Koenig | Carson, ND 58529 | $100,590 |
50 | Galen Christian Meier | Carson, ND 58529 | $100,196 |
51 | Mark Theodore Koenig | Carson, ND 58529 | $95,817 |
52 | Duane Patrick Kuntz | Elgin, ND 58533 | $94,488 |
53 | Direct Ag Supply, Inc | Mandan, ND 58554 | $93,723 |
54 | Robert Hintz | Flasher, ND 58535 | $89,536 |
55 | Michael P Jochim | Flasher, ND 58535 | $87,467 |
56 | Mark A Jochim | Flasher, ND 58535 | $87,406 |
57 | Aaron Friesz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $80,611 |
58 | Eric Friesz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $80,501 |
59 | Jay Donald Staiger | Hebron, ND 58638 | $80,417 |
60 | Matthew R Alt | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $78,264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”