Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Grant County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 323
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $559,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dawson Brothers Partnership | Almont, ND 58520 | $3,356 |
42 | Mark A Jochim | Flasher, ND 58535 | $3,328 |
43 | Michael P Jochim | Flasher, ND 58535 | $3,328 |
44 | Marlyn Staiger | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $3,327 |
45 | David Roger Bueligen | New Salem, ND 58563 | $3,305 |
46 | Saul Jared Maier | Elgin, ND 58533 | $3,305 |
47 | Casey Meyer | Carson, ND 58529 | $3,099 |
48 | Chance W Fuchs | Carson, ND 58529 | $3,081 |
49 | Matthew Niederman | Morristown, SD 57645 | $3,047 |
50 | Glenn Delmar Seidler | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $3,029 |
51 | Jake Mark Koenig | Carson, ND 58529 | $2,972 |
52 | Matthew Gregory Allen Tishmack | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $2,940 |
53 | Donald Calvin Mistelski | Morristown, SD 57645 | $2,933 |
54 | Leonard Gerhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,925 |
55 | Jeffrey Striegel | Carson, ND 58529 | $2,918 |
56 | Clifford Ace Johnson | Watauga, SD 57660 | $2,906 |
57 | Bruce Gross | Shields, ND 58569 | $2,888 |
58 | Russell Dennis Woodbury | Carson, ND 58529 | $2,823 |
59 | Cole Jeffory Sandau | Elgin, ND 58533 | $2,822 |
60 | Claude Ulrich | Carson, ND 58529 | $2,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”