Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Grant County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 323
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $559,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Medora Meyer | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,887 |
102 | Blaine M Mollman | Mc Intosh, SD 57641 | $1,842 |
103 | Verrick Nathan Schock | Carson, ND 58529 | $1,837 |
104 | Leslie Anne Niederman | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,829 |
105 | Kermet Kahl | Shadehill, SD 57638 | $1,825 |
106 | Tyrel Bruce Zingg | Carson, ND 58529 | $1,807 |
107 | Russell A Hehn | Leith, ND 58529 | $1,781 |
108 | Kyle Russell Woodbury | Carson, ND 58529 | $1,740 |
109 | Clarence Henry Laub III | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,729 |
110 | Clarence Roth Jr | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $1,719 |
111 | Dennis Lee Johnson | Almont, ND 58520 | $1,702 |
112 | Mark M Eslinger | Baldwin, ND 58521 | $1,701 |
113 | Dean Richard Gerving | Mandan, ND 58554 | $1,682 |
114 | Alan W Alt | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $1,670 |
115 | Pete Christian Hetle | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,668 |
116 | Mark Lee Werner | Flasher, ND 58535 | $1,666 |
117 | Delvin Dale Zimmerman | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $1,652 |
118 | Curtis Frederick Kobilansky | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,633 |
119 | Daniel Paul Ackerman | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,631 |
120 | Blaine Duane Ottmar | Elgin, ND 58533 | $1,613 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”