Production Flexibility Program in Grant County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 936
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $17,207,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bryan Lynn Vandenburg | Flasher, ND 58535 | $118,852 |
22 | Wilmer Eslinger | Elgin, ND 58533 | $117,460 |
23 | Saul Jared Maier | Elgin, ND 58533 | $117,022 |
24 | Mark Theodore Koenig | Carson, ND 58529 | $112,563 |
25 | Koenig Farm Joint Venture | Carson, ND 58529 | $111,250 |
26 | Jan Dean Sprecher | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $109,869 |
27 | Duane Woodbury | Carson, ND 58529 | $108,139 |
28 | Clayton Zacher | Elgin, ND 58533 | $107,841 |
29 | Virgil Arthur Stern | Elgin, ND 58533 | $107,784 |
30 | Don William Mueller | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $100,696 |
31 | Ruby Margaret Pahl | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $98,901 |
32 | Elmer A Pahl Estate | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $98,896 |
33 | Daryl Bryan Birdsall | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $97,008 |
34 | Allen James Sprenger | Elgin, ND 58533 | $92,178 |
35 | Russell Dennis Woodbury | Carson, ND 58529 | $91,683 |
36 | Waldemar G Alt | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $91,450 |
37 | Jonathan Mueller | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $88,734 |
38 | Duane Patrick Kuntz | Elgin, ND 58533 | $86,082 |
39 | Dean Mervin Ellison | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $85,696 |
40 | Wesley J Niederman Jr | Elgin, ND 58533 | $83,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”