Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Griggs County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 113
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Griggs County, North Dakota totaled $4,333,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Guscette Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $63,393 |
22 | Randy Ressler | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $61,570 |
23 | Patricia Lillian Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $59,058 |
24 | James Olaf Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $59,058 |
25 | Keven Jon Lunde | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $58,816 |
26 | Bt Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $56,356 |
27 | Timothy Weber | Binford, ND 58416 | $49,953 |
28 | Jonathan David Erickson | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $49,277 |
29 | Janis Hagen | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $46,525 |
30 | Daniel Joseph Heinz | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $43,578 |
31 | Endre Hans Aarestad | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $42,369 |
32 | Chad Eric Haugen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $39,242 |
33 | Annette Heyerdahl | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $39,194 |
34 | Jay Zimmerman | Amenia, ND 58004 | $37,118 |
35 | Zimprich Farms Inc | Aneta, ND 58212 | $33,880 |
36 | Douglas Hugh Mahan | Mcville, ND 58254 | $33,852 |
37 | Michael Dennis Peterson | Finley, ND 58230 | $32,956 |
38 | Cheryl Ann Peterson | Finley, ND 58230 | $32,956 |
39 | Corey Vincent Murray | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $32,793 |
40 | Kevin Roy Black | Glenfield, ND 58443 | $32,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”