Total Emergency Relief Program in Griggs County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 216
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Griggs County, North Dakota totaled $15,723,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Austin Mccardle | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $121,782 |
42 | Dylan James Goplen | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $119,000 |
43 | Martin Ueland | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $113,972 |
44 | Bruce Lee Hazard | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $110,942 |
45 | Jason Haugen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $110,119 |
46 | Leroy Richard Eggermont | Binford, ND 58416 | $108,260 |
47 | Scott Saxberg | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $107,857 |
48 | Cia Rae Gronneberg | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $107,275 |
49 | James Tenneson | Binford, ND 58416 | $106,739 |
50 | Nathan L Hazard | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $102,822 |
51 | Todd Joseph Edland | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $99,838 |
52 | Jayme Tenneson | Binford, ND 58416 | $97,298 |
53 | Scott Allen Tranby | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $94,320 |
54 | Carter Wayne Anderson | Sutton, ND 58484 | $93,256 |
55 | Timothy Weber | Binford, ND 58416 | $83,030 |
56 | Lynn Johnson | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $82,856 |
57 | Jacob W. Heinz | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $81,445 |
58 | Douglas Robert Johnson | Sutton, ND 58484 | $78,779 |
59 | Mark Anderson | Sutton, ND 58484 | $77,774 |
60 | Tim Anderson | Sutton, ND 58484 | $77,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”