Total Conservation Programs in Griggs County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 263
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Griggs County, North Dakota totaled $2,086,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | David M Barhan | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $6,899 |
102 | Sue E Kraft | Moorhead, MN 56561 | $6,875 |
103 | Derrick Arnold Adrian | Binford, ND 58416 | $6,549 |
104 | Roger Mccardle | Sacramento, CA 95831 | $6,392 |
105 | Leroy Richard Eggermont Jr | Binford, ND 58416 | $6,378 |
106 | Angela Huso | Parkton, MD 21120 | $6,283 |
107 | Daniel Bruce Paintner | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $6,254 |
108 | Randall S Trostad | Mcville, ND 58254 | $6,059 |
109 | Renae Briss | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $6,033 |
110 | Marla Jean Larson | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $6,008 |
111 | Benson Eisenbeis Partnership | Fargo, ND 58103 | $5,874 |
112 | Lausch Farms Jv | Valley City, ND 58072 | $5,702 |
113 | Mark S Hoss | Binford, ND 58416 | $5,692 |
114 | Bryan L Ressler | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $5,565 |
115 | Henry J Berger | Luverne, ND 58056 | $5,543 |
116 | Dustin James Amann | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $5,531 |
117 | Martha Laplant | Binford, ND 58416 | $5,338 |
118 | Erik K Fritzell | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $5,229 |
119 | Lynn Johnson | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $5,206 |
120 | Curt Arthur Beattie | Valley City, ND 58072 | $5,009 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”