Total Conservation Programs in Griggs County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 288
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Griggs County, North Dakota totaled $1,998,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Cheryl Kruger | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $4,617 |
122 | Dianne Marie Koll | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $4,617 |
123 | , | $4,565 | |
124 | Gregory E Messner | Seattle, WA 98115 | $4,511 |
125 | Red Willow Luth Bible Camp Assn | Binford, ND 58416 | $4,477 |
126 | Marilyn Jacobson | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $4,433 |
127 | Bt Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $4,420 |
128 | Stephen Hans Froiland | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $4,393 |
129 | Cwbnn Llp | Valley City, ND 58072 | $4,326 |
130 | Stacey Fussy | Bowlus, MN 56314 | $4,250 |
131 | Scott Steiner | Fargo, ND 58103 | $4,250 |
132 | Cody Overby | Binford, ND 58416 | $4,186 |
133 | Virginia Erickson | Kensal, ND 58455 | $4,134 |
134 | Norris Iverson Family Farm Llp | Fargo, ND 58104 | $4,128 |
135 | Richard Michaelis | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $4,052 |
136 | Arden Helland | Pasadena, MD 21122 | $4,038 |
137 | Paula A Bewick | Monroe, WA 98272 | $3,972 |
138 | Louise Boisjolie | Apache Junction, AZ 85120 | $3,963 |
139 | Leland Haugen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $3,880 |
140 | Charles B Johnson | San Jose, CA 95136 | $3,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”