Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 248
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $1,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Madler Bros-jv | New England, ND 58647 | $17,727 |
22 | Rob Messer | Mott, ND 58646 | $17,541 |
23 | Gerald John Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $17,486 |
24 | Joshua James Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $17,006 |
25 | Shane James Magelky | New England, ND 58647 | $16,904 |
26 | Delmar Arthur Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $16,697 |
27 | Brian John Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $16,591 |
28 | Brent Martin Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,551 |
29 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $16,536 |
30 | Ken Hochhalter | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,361 |
31 | James E Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,172 |
32 | Alton Ray Lien | Regent, ND 58650 | $16,095 |
33 | Dakota Western Bank | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $15,989 |
34 | Valery Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $15,133 |
35 | Beau Daniel Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $14,661 |
36 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,571 |
37 | Dustin Peter Ebner | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,526 |
38 | Brian Allen Jung | New England, ND 58647 | $14,506 |
39 | Daren Lee Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $14,478 |
40 | Merlyn J Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $14,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”