Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 133
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $758,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $9,011 |
22 | Casey Lee Hoherz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $8,491 |
23 | Bradley John Steiner | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,965 |
24 | Jason W Dorner | New England, ND 58647 | $7,794 |
25 | Rettinger Ranch Inc | New England, ND 58647 | $7,693 |
26 | Nadine Meuler | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,503 |
27 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,499 |
28 | Leland Ebert | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,391 |
29 | Merlyn J Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $7,239 |
30 | Patrick Aaron Kilzer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $6,865 |
31 | Donald Robert Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $6,792 |
32 | Dale Mark Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,739 |
33 | Lee Kathrein | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $6,703 |
34 | Matthew Dobitz | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,653 |
35 | Dustin Peter Ebner | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,444 |
36 | Gerald John Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,440 |
37 | Ken Hochhalter | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,379 |
38 | Ben Hetzel | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $6,060 |
39 | Brent Martin Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $5,875 |
40 | Mary Joanne Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $5,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”