Market Loss Assistance Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 835
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $13,688,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Edward Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $90,462 |
22 | Starla Deann Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $90,434 |
23 | Gary Lee Doe | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $89,656 |
24 | David Lee Anderson | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $88,181 |
25 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $86,984 |
26 | Darwyn F Mayer | Mott, ND 58646 | $85,699 |
27 | Roy Roger Rutherford | Regent, ND 58650 | $85,529 |
28 | Ronnie Lee Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $85,518 |
29 | Raymond F Kilzer | Mott, ND 58646 | $84,811 |
30 | Allen L Schulz | Mott, ND 58646 | $83,274 |
31 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $83,168 |
32 | Dale Ralph Johnson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $82,626 |
33 | Francis H Mayer | Mott, ND 58646 | $82,194 |
34 | Dwight Lee Belland | New England, ND 58647 | $80,740 |
35 | Jerald N Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $80,573 |
36 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $80,253 |
37 | Leland Howard Johnson | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $76,113 |
38 | Lyle R Hoffer | Regent, ND 58650 | $74,334 |
39 | Curtis Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $74,215 |
40 | Benjamin Schaible Est | Mott, ND 58646 | $73,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”