Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 170
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $997,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Carmen Connie Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $6,445 |
42 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $6,220 |
43 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $6,220 |
44 | Jonathan & Robin Stang-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $5,972 |
45 | Jess Allen Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $5,647 |
46 | Rodney Allen Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $5,585 |
47 | Perry August Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $5,139 |
48 | Starla Deann Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $5,139 |
49 | Daxon A Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,832 |
50 | Christopher Carl Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,751 |
51 | Dale John Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,734 |
52 | , | $4,452 | |
53 | Kent Lowell Maershbecker | New England, ND 58647 | $4,396 |
54 | Rory Cole Hintz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $4,361 |
55 | Darrel Jay Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $3,947 |
56 | Austin Kautzman | Mott, ND 58646 | $3,914 |
57 | Janice K Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $3,891 |
58 | Leland Ebert | Mott, ND 58646 | $3,022 |
59 | Dominic John Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,940 |
60 | Eric James Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”