Loan Deficiency in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 707
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $32,251,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale Ralph Johnson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $202,716 |
42 | Raymond F Kilzer | Mott, ND 58646 | $200,132 |
43 | Jonathan Larry Stang | Regent, ND 58650 | $199,544 |
44 | Allen L Schulz | Mott, ND 58646 | $198,756 |
45 | Carol Hertz Est | Mott, ND 58646 | $198,405 |
46 | Rodney Allen Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $190,213 |
47 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $189,865 |
48 | Darrel Jay Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $188,169 |
49 | Del Lynn Eisenbarth | New England, ND 58647 | $186,188 |
50 | Lucille Marie Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $184,404 |
51 | August Carl Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $184,025 |
52 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $183,449 |
53 | Roy Roger Rutherford | Regent, ND 58650 | $182,841 |
54 | Charles Edward Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $179,020 |
55 | Gary Leroy Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $175,660 |
56 | Marvin C Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $175,647 |
57 | Scott M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $174,836 |
58 | Mark David Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $173,557 |
59 | Garret Ray Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $171,980 |
60 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $171,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”