Total Conservation Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 431
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $2,687,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Csb Trust | Colorado Springs, CO 80906 | $15,016 |
42 | Oscar H Klein | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,763 |
43 | Dale Mark Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,498 |
44 | Catherine L Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,132 |
45 | Howard Clarence Steiner | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,067 |
46 | Lavonn J Hanson | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $13,498 |
47 | Bradley John Steiner | Mott, ND 58646 | $13,429 |
48 | Thomas Graham Mcenroe | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $12,835 |
49 | Jos P Grundhauser | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $12,692 |
50 | Douglas W Bolte | Regent, ND 58650 | $12,665 |
51 | Ilene Hardmeyer | Mott, ND 58646 | $12,203 |
52 | Duane Jacob Kraft | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $12,151 |
53 | D & G Ackerman Family Trust | Anchorage, AK 99516 | $11,826 |
54 | Charles J Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,825 |
55 | Tina M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,825 |
56 | Eric C Petrosky | South Lyon, MI 48178 | $11,548 |
57 | Baumgartner Joint Venture | Malta, MT 59538 | $11,502 |
58 | Donald Gary Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,304 |
59 | Russell A Senn | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $11,290 |
60 | Robert Grant Larson | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”