Total Conservation Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 416
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $2,953,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | 5 Friedt Brothers, Llp | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,800 |
42 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $16,697 |
43 | Dale Mark Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $15,691 |
44 | , | $15,450 | |
45 | Oscar H Klein | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,763 |
46 | Thomas Graham Mcenroe | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $13,618 |
47 | Lavonn J Hanson | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $13,498 |
48 | Todd Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $13,291 |
49 | Rodney Allen Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $13,017 |
50 | Jos P Grundhauser | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $12,692 |
51 | Duane Lutz | Bowman, ND 58623 | $12,584 |
52 | Jill Annette Kerzman | Mott, ND 58646 | $12,567 |
53 | Baumgartner Joint Venture | Malta, MT 59538 | $12,405 |
54 | Robert Grant Larson | Mott, ND 58646 | $12,381 |
55 | Er Land Llp | New England, ND 58647 | $12,325 |
56 | Ilene Hardmeyer | Mott, ND 58646 | $12,203 |
57 | Eric Carr | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $11,961 |
58 | D & G Ackerman Family Trust | Anchorage, AK 99516 | $11,826 |
59 | Shawn W Lince | Elgin, ND 58533 | $11,478 |
60 | Russell A Senn | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $11,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”