Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 137
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $3,325,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dean Brugamyer | New England, ND 58647 | $18,775 |
62 | Derrick J Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $18,595 |
63 | James Dale Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $18,379 |
64 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $18,379 |
65 | Carter Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $17,110 |
66 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $16,860 |
67 | Robert Joseph Wax | Regent, ND 58650 | $16,475 |
68 | Dennis Peter Wax | Regent, ND 58650 | $16,475 |
69 | Dale John Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,421 |
70 | Penny Nicole Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $16,421 |
71 | Eugene E Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $15,616 |
72 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $15,059 |
73 | Delinda Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $14,391 |
74 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $14,323 |
75 | Bert Andrew Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $14,282 |
76 | Allan Joseph Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $14,216 |
77 | Kimberly Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $14,216 |
78 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $14,197 |
79 | Jess Schulz | New England, ND 58647 | $14,133 |
80 | Alvin Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $13,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”