Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 937
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $74,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Lee Doe | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $346,276 |
62 | Carmen Connie Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $344,129 |
63 | Charles J Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $343,698 |
64 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $340,019 |
65 | Vanlishout Farms Inc | Mott, ND 58646 | $339,569 |
66 | Dalynn Duane Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $337,698 |
67 | Curtis L Wax And Michele D Wax Revocable Living Tr | Regent, ND 58650 | $334,504 |
68 | Amy Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $332,676 |
69 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $331,985 |
70 | Beverly Kay Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $328,388 |
71 | Scott M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $327,860 |
72 | Danny Koppinger | Mott, ND 58646 | $327,131 |
73 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $326,158 |
74 | Donald Gary Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $325,200 |
75 | Leslie D & Nadine A Swindler-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $323,374 |
76 | Ronald D & Dianne J Sorenson-jv | New England, ND 58647 | $318,483 |
77 | Donald Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $315,883 |
78 | Del Lynn Eisenbarth | New England, ND 58647 | $314,920 |
79 | Dennis Dean Hummel | Mott, ND 58646 | $314,403 |
80 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $313,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”