Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 170
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $997,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gregg Dion Urlacher | Regent, ND 58650 | $2,210 |
62 | Daren Lee Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $2,165 |
63 | Dalynn Duane Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,132 |
64 | Cynthia Marie Krauter | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $2,114 |
65 | Gary F Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,989 |
66 | John W Prange | Laguna Beach, CA 92651 | $1,975 |
67 | Philip J Urlacher | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,971 |
68 | Joshua James Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,894 |
69 | Justin Dale Zich | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $1,873 |
70 | Jim P Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,785 |
71 | Robert E Carlson | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,767 |
72 | Angela Carlson | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,767 |
73 | Clifford Peter Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $1,757 |
74 | Eugene E Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $1,653 |
75 | Beau Daniel Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,627 |
76 | William Tanner Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $1,627 |
77 | Allen L Schulz | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,617 |
78 | Aaron Joseph Krauter | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $1,591 |
79 | Jocelyn Wiesinger | Bentley, ND 58562 | $1,581 |
80 | Rob Messer | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”