Total Emergency Relief Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 220
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $20,503,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Darwyn F Mayer | Mott, ND 58646 | $130,475 |
62 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $128,650 |
63 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $128,650 |
64 | Shannon Ray Rafferty | Regent, ND 58650 | $126,454 |
65 | Lance Michael Olson | Mott, ND 58646 | $125,000 |
66 | Ronnie Lee Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $123,278 |
67 | Beverly Kay Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $123,278 |
68 | Roger T Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $122,403 |
69 | Christopher Carl Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $121,715 |
70 | Carter Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $119,953 |
71 | Bailie Jean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $119,953 |
72 | Dylan Joseph Witte | Regent, ND 58650 | $118,897 |
73 | Levi Nickolas Krebs | New England, ND 58647 | $118,277 |
74 | Alex Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $117,167 |
75 | Leon Joseph Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $115,377 |
76 | Raymond Nick Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $112,108 |
77 | John Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $112,106 |
78 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $107,252 |
79 | Douglas R Keller | New England, ND 58647 | $106,230 |
80 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $104,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”