Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 327
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $10,225,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | R & R Grain | Regent, ND 58650 | $61,503 |
62 | Reid Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $59,367 |
63 | Jessica Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $59,366 |
64 | Leon Kirschemann | Regent, ND 58650 | $58,826 |
65 | Burnell Roger Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $58,527 |
66 | Carter Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $56,808 |
67 | Rettinger Ranch Inc | New England, ND 58647 | $56,787 |
68 | Bryan Doe | Regent, ND 58650 | $55,729 |
69 | Jill Doe | Regent, ND 58650 | $55,729 |
70 | Brent Howard Roth | Bison, SD 57620 | $55,477 |
71 | Joe Christopher Schorsch | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $54,962 |
72 | John Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $54,448 |
73 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $53,814 |
74 | Delinda Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $53,811 |
75 | Jess Allen Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $53,497 |
76 | Scott Allen Monke | New England, ND 58647 | $52,334 |
77 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $51,513 |
78 | Douglas R Keller | New England, ND 58647 | $49,609 |
79 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $48,099 |
80 | Dale John Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $48,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”