Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 937
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $74,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James Dale Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $312,700 |
82 | Dennis John Wegh | Regent, ND 58650 | $311,335 |
83 | Sheldon Jay Bohnhoff | New England, ND 58647 | $308,610 |
84 | Ronnie Lee Reich | Mott, ND 58646 | $308,038 |
85 | Bryan Doe | Regent, ND 58650 | $307,529 |
86 | Robert Louis Bohnhoff | New England, ND 58647 | $299,958 |
87 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $296,724 |
88 | Douglas R Keller | New England, ND 58647 | $295,248 |
89 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $293,285 |
90 | Clifford Peter Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $292,245 |
91 | August Carl Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $287,565 |
92 | Lucille Marie Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $287,557 |
93 | Marvin Dale Jorstad | Regent, ND 58650 | $284,386 |
94 | Gary Leroy Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $281,630 |
95 | Dale Mark Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $281,207 |
96 | Terry Lynn Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $280,970 |
97 | Bradley John Steiner | Mott, ND 58646 | $277,657 |
98 | Robert Joseph Wax | Regent, ND 58650 | $277,350 |
99 | Dennis Peter Wax | Regent, ND 58650 | $277,350 |
100 | Joseph Arnold Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $274,251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”