Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 327
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $10,225,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Penny Nicole Wegh | Mott, ND 58646 | $48,044 |
82 | Alex Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $46,669 |
83 | Dale Mark Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $46,659 |
84 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $46,241 |
85 | Donald Gary Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $46,080 |
86 | Carmen Connie Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $46,080 |
87 | Vanlishout Farms Inc | Mott, ND 58646 | $45,886 |
88 | Shannon Ray Rafferty | Regent, ND 58650 | $45,377 |
89 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $45,074 |
90 | James Dale Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $44,476 |
91 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $44,476 |
92 | Denver Sidney Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $44,414 |
93 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $44,309 |
94 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $44,088 |
95 | Jeremy Jay Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $43,934 |
96 | James Scott Pahlmeyer | Regent, ND 58650 | $43,864 |
97 | Allan Joseph Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $43,235 |
98 | Roger Alan Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $43,150 |
99 | Danny Koppinger | Mott, ND 58646 | $43,096 |
100 | Kimberly Kohl | New England, ND 58647 | $42,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”