Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 327
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $10,225,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Leslie Kirschmann | Regent, ND 58650 | $42,809 |
102 | Dennis John Wegh | Regent, ND 58650 | $42,799 |
103 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $42,692 |
104 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $42,692 |
105 | Jeffrey Leon Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $40,947 |
106 | Charles J Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $40,775 |
107 | Tina M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $40,775 |
108 | Bryan David Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $39,955 |
109 | Curtis L Wax And Michele D Wax Revocable Living Tr | Regent, ND 58650 | $39,729 |
110 | Brad Donald Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $39,325 |
111 | Anderson Farms Lllp | Regent, ND 58650 | $39,083 |
112 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $38,976 |
113 | Catherine L Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $38,976 |
114 | Christopher Binstock | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $37,831 |
115 | Donald Robert Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $37,801 |
116 | Warren Gilbert Doe | New England, ND 58647 | $37,728 |
117 | Joshua Greff | Regent, ND 58650 | $37,185 |
118 | Weston Tyler Bohnet | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $36,980 |
119 | Lee Grosz | Mott, ND 58646 | $36,451 |
120 | Delmar D Schaible Family Trust | Mott, ND 58646 | $34,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”