Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 937
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $74,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Robert Candrian | Regent, ND 58650 | $240,791 |
122 | Alton Ray Lien | Regent, ND 58650 | $234,330 |
123 | James Scott Pahlmeyer | Regent, ND 58650 | $228,132 |
124 | Alan Herner | Mott, ND 58646 | $227,530 |
125 | Todd Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $225,611 |
126 | Delmar Schaible/delmar D Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $225,476 |
127 | Denver Sidney Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $224,708 |
128 | Sebastian Theodore Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $224,548 |
129 | Tina M Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $222,500 |
130 | , | $220,345 | |
131 | Gary Schaefer | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $218,604 |
132 | Burnell Roger Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $216,999 |
133 | Matt Quentin Miller | Mott, ND 58646 | $212,772 |
134 | Joseph Adam Kathrein | New England, ND 58647 | $212,716 |
135 | Jess Schulz | New England, ND 58647 | $211,573 |
136 | Aaron Joseph Krauter | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $210,404 |
137 | Levi Nickolas Krebs | New England, ND 58647 | $209,650 |
138 | Bert Andrew Schaible | Mott, ND 58646 | $209,433 |
139 | Dale Ralph Johnson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $208,790 |
140 | Jon Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $207,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”