Direct Payment Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 973
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $47,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Roger Alan Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $142,484 |
122 | Timothy J Bieber | Mott, ND 58646 | $141,009 |
123 | David George Schauer | Regent, ND 58650 | $140,296 |
124 | Howard Roy Roth | Mott, ND 58646 | $140,205 |
125 | Dale Allen Zich | Mott, ND 58646 | $139,275 |
126 | James Alan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $132,944 |
127 | Sebastian Theodore Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $132,577 |
128 | Archie R Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $131,997 |
129 | Dalynn Duane Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $130,928 |
130 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $130,620 |
131 | Warren Gilbert Doe | New England, ND 58647 | $130,282 |
132 | Clifford Peter Stecher | New England, ND 58647 | $129,655 |
133 | Ross Thomas | Reeder, ND 58649 | $129,229 |
134 | James Scott Pahlmeyer | Regent, ND 58650 | $128,814 |
135 | Donald Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $128,360 |
136 | Leonard Kaufman | Regent, ND 58650 | $127,020 |
137 | Larry A Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $126,042 |
138 | Gregg Dion Urlacher | Regent, ND 58650 | $125,827 |
139 | James Alan Kerzman | Mott, ND 58646 | $124,253 |
140 | Mayer Farms Partnership | Regent, ND 58650 | $123,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”