Direct Payment Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 973
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $47,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jacqueline Larson | Mott, ND 58646 | $94,913 |
162 | Gary F Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $94,767 |
163 | Leslie Lee Friez | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $93,877 |
164 | Ann Regina Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $93,843 |
165 | Marvin C Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $93,843 |
166 | Dale William Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $93,053 |
167 | Shannon Ray Rafferty | Regent, ND 58650 | $92,608 |
168 | James E Binstock | Regent, ND 58650 | $92,086 |
169 | Victor F Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $91,759 |
170 | Linus George Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $91,743 |
171 | Myron Larson Farm Lllp | Mott, ND 58646 | $91,712 |
172 | Gary Schaefer | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $91,406 |
173 | David C Madler | New England, ND 58647 | $87,471 |
174 | Carol Hertz Est | Mott, ND 58646 | $86,374 |
175 | Thomas Charles Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $86,232 |
176 | Brian John Kouba | Regent, ND 58650 | $85,770 |
177 | Dean Brugamyer | New England, ND 58647 | $84,317 |
178 | Delmar Arthur Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $83,817 |
179 | Gerald John Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $83,070 |
180 | Brandon Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $80,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”