Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 530
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $17,162,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Constance Joy Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $103,691 |
42 | Anderson Farms Lllp | Regent, ND 58650 | $103,050 |
43 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $102,712 |
44 | Reid Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $102,464 |
45 | Jessica Sorenson | New England, ND 58647 | $102,462 |
46 | Richard & Connie Lutz-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $101,521 |
47 | Dalynn Duane Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $100,945 |
48 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $98,205 |
49 | Bryan David Jirges | New England, ND 58647 | $96,148 |
50 | Todd Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $95,487 |
51 | Jon Lutz | New England, ND 58647 | $95,487 |
52 | Rodney Allen Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $94,711 |
53 | Leslie & Connie Haberstroh-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $94,459 |
54 | Sheri Ann Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $94,442 |
55 | Jonathan Chris Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $94,439 |
56 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $94,299 |
57 | Marc P Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $94,109 |
58 | Marvin Dale Jorstad | Regent, ND 58650 | $94,086 |
59 | Dean Duane Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $92,499 |
60 | Dawn Annette Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $92,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”