Total Disaster Programs in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 267
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $7,639,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Scott Allen Monke | New England, ND 58647 | $84,101 |
22 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $82,523 |
23 | Jerald N Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $79,058 |
24 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $76,460 |
25 | Robert Candrian | Regent, ND 58650 | $74,753 |
26 | Christopher Carl Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $71,380 |
27 | Brian Allen Jung | New England, ND 58647 | $70,581 |
28 | Constance Joy Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $70,534 |
29 | Brandon Dean Jalbert | Reeder, ND 58649 | $70,532 |
30 | James G Thomas | Mott, ND 58646 | $64,016 |
31 | Bnc National Bank ** | Linton, ND 58552 | $63,474 |
32 | Curtis L Wax And Michele D Wax Revocable Living Tr | Regent, ND 58650 | $63,044 |
33 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $62,299 |
34 | Leon Louis Monke | Regent, ND 58650 | $62,098 |
35 | Robert Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $61,617 |
36 | Richard Stagl | New England, ND 58647 | $59,962 |
37 | Marc P Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $59,615 |
38 | James E Carlson | Mott, ND 58646 | $59,417 |
39 | Dennis John Wegh | Regent, ND 58650 | $59,096 |
40 | Tracey Jean Johnson | Mott, ND 58646 | $55,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”