Total Conservation Programs in Kidder County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $366,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Janet A Brackenbury | Steele, ND 58482 | $6,645 |
22 | Darwin Lee Enzminger | Tappen, ND 58487 | $5,630 |
23 | Larry Leier | Valley City, ND 58072 | $5,148 |
24 | Betty A Schultes | Rushville, NE 69360 | $4,959 |
25 | , | $4,953 | |
26 | Shelly M Schmidt | Colorado Springs, CO 80924 | $4,817 |
27 | William D Lytle | Medina, ND 58467 | $4,274 |
28 | Wolf Family Limited Liability Partnership | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $4,076 |
29 | Ana Neir | Fargo, ND 58104 | $4,046 |
30 | Dillon John Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $4,009 |
31 | Joanie Rau | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $3,543 |
32 | Elaine Hattie Soupir | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $3,388 |
33 | Kenneth George Albrecht | Carrington, ND 58421 | $3,364 |
34 | Robert Subart | Robinson, ND 58478 | $3,218 |
35 | Mardikian Family Trust | Mandan, ND 58554 | $3,127 |
36 | Elaine M Landrigan - Elaine M Landrigan Revocable | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $3,025 |
37 | Darold James Soupir | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $2,862 |
38 | Tyrel Rau | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $2,830 |
39 | , | $2,340 | |
40 | Kathleen Janke | Steele, ND 58482 | $2,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”