Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Kidder County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 297
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $1,228,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rodney Wayne Livingston | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $8,439 |
42 | Steven Charles Fallgatter | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $8,407 |
43 | Dennis Morlock | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $8,389 |
44 | Steve John Seil | Bowdon, ND 58418 | $8,280 |
45 | Wayne J Schulz | Streeter, ND 58483 | $8,257 |
46 | Frank William Puklich | Steele, ND 58482 | $8,091 |
47 | Alden Gerard Fitterer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $8,076 |
48 | Dean Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $8,001 |
49 | Trever Minh Bayer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $7,934 |
50 | Darwin Remmick | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,853 |
51 | Whitman Ranch | Robinson, ND 58478 | $7,759 |
52 | Barry Lee Pfeifle | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $7,480 |
53 | Gene Allan Hetletved | Robinson, ND 58478 | $7,226 |
54 | Tyler James Devore | Steele, ND 58482 | $7,213 |
55 | Dillon Hoffman | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $7,195 |
56 | Wesley Arthur Trautmann | Robinson, ND 58478 | $7,194 |
57 | Chase William Trautmann | Robinson, ND 58478 | $7,193 |
58 | Joseph M Fettig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $7,179 |
59 | Timothy R Kraft | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $6,886 |
60 | Clint Gustav Hetletved | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $6,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”