Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Kidder County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 311
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $678,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tyler R Fischer | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $4,800 |
42 | Brian Joe Schneider | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $4,718 |
43 | Clyde W Trautmann | Robinson, ND 58478 | $4,430 |
44 | John Paul Schumacher | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $4,379 |
45 | Bonnie Lee Fettig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $4,318 |
46 | Gene Allan Hetletved | Robinson, ND 58478 | $4,280 |
47 | Milton Weippert | Tappen, ND 58487 | $4,236 |
48 | Dustin S Brossart | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $4,212 |
49 | Richard M Rohrich | Steele, ND 58482 | $4,206 |
50 | Gary Leroy Aichele | Steele, ND 58482 | $4,205 |
51 | Cory Duane Mack | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $3,981 |
52 | Gary D Schoenhard | Steele, ND 58482 | $3,975 |
53 | Alden Gerard Fitterer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $3,937 |
54 | Jason A Schmidt | Medina, ND 58467 | $3,893 |
55 | Kevin Daniel Price | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $3,848 |
56 | Cole Fettig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $3,623 |
57 | Christopher L Fettig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $3,613 |
58 | Gary A Doll | Dawson, ND 58428 | $3,590 |
59 | Rodney Roy Scherbenske | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $3,577 |
60 | John D Mehlhoff | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $3,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”