Market Gains in Kidder County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 99
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $427,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Curtis Kuipers | Tappen, ND 58487 | $668 |
62 | Edwin Schmidt Estate | Streeter, ND 58483 | $653 |
63 | Brian Wayne Morlock | Sykeston, ND 58486 | $632 |
64 | Kenneth Dale Dockter | Dawson, ND 58428 | $630 |
65 | Roger Junior Kaiser | Tappen, ND 58487 | $629 |
66 | Alden Gerard Fitterer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $606 |
67 | Jon Dekrey | Tappen, ND 58487 | $540 |
68 | Richard Allan Dewitz | Tappen, ND 58487 | $523 |
69 | Raymond Thomas Hornung | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $519 |
70 | Don Hager | Braddock, ND 58524 | $458 |
71 | Berdean Dennis Thorsness | Tappen, ND 58487 | $455 |
72 | Christ William Gerr | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $439 |
73 | Lavern Leno | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $420 |
74 | Donald William Weisenburger | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $420 |
75 | James Marlin Dewald | Steele, ND 58482 | $392 |
76 | Delaine M Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $383 |
77 | Reinhold Guthmiller Estate | Robinson, ND 58478 | $378 |
78 | Kent Allen Pfennig | Driscoll, ND 58532 | $361 |
79 | Gerald Gene Rath Estate | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $360 |
80 | Arlyn N Schmidt | Medina, ND 58467 | $333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”