Total Conservation Programs in Kidder County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,183
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $62,041,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mike Krous | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $219,826 |
62 | Ward Whitman | Robinson, ND 58478 | $219,773 |
63 | Lorenz Rohde Estate | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $217,478 |
64 | Kathryn Marie Bauer | Monticello, MN 55362 | $217,259 |
65 | Lyle Bayer Estate | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $217,118 |
66 | Norman Knodel | Steele, ND 58482 | $212,924 |
67 | Mary Ann Binder | Steele, ND 58482 | $212,369 |
68 | Clarence A Wolf | Elk River, MN 55330 | $206,151 |
69 | Arlene May Flanders | Robinson, ND 58478 | $205,305 |
70 | Wesley Dean Almer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $200,997 |
71 | John E Randall | Robinson, ND 58478 | $200,362 |
72 | Werner George Kinnischtzke | Tappen, ND 58487 | $199,656 |
73 | Jon Milton Dobbert | Robinson, ND 58478 | $199,294 |
74 | Pius Joseph Hager Jr | Braddock, ND 58524 | $197,074 |
75 | Patricia Fennern | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $196,851 |
76 | Darold James Soupir | Courtenay, ND 58426 | $194,038 |
77 | Duane S Tollefson | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $194,000 |
78 | Gary Dean Hanson | Elk River, MN 55330 | $193,415 |
79 | Allen Lee Almer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $190,353 |
80 | Alvin Dewald | Streeter, ND 58483 | $190,152 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”