Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Kidder County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 530
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $9,255,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Victor Francis Meier | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $16,724 |
122 | Jane Thomas | Tappen, ND 58487 | $16,646 |
123 | Larry L Dockter | Medina, ND 58467 | $16,507 |
124 | Justin James Dewald | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $16,458 |
125 | Norman Christof Bickel | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $16,438 |
126 | Corey Lynn Schumacher | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $16,197 |
127 | James Lee Bodvig | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $16,015 |
128 | Clayton Duane Jasper | Robinson, ND 58478 | $15,789 |
129 | Paul Subart | Steele, ND 58482 | $15,593 |
130 | Jagged Heart Ranch Inc | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $15,587 |
131 | Shawn J Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $15,402 |
132 | Ronald Rewald | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $15,237 |
133 | Dennis Ray Neustel Jr | Robinson, ND 58478 | $15,186 |
134 | Michael James Binder | Steele, ND 58482 | $15,068 |
135 | Walter Albert Leno | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $14,826 |
136 | Dacotah Bank ** | Rolla, ND 58367 | $14,813 |
137 | Raymond Edward Wetzel Jr | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $14,640 |
138 | James Jacob Bickel | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $14,436 |
139 | Glen Vernon Dekrey | Steele, ND 58482 | $14,433 |
140 | Samuel Sofus Ongstad | Harvey, ND 58341 | $14,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”