Farm Subsidy information
Kidder County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kidder County, North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 581
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $30,809,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dawson Farms | Dawson, ND 58428 | $827,211 |
2 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $745,336 |
3 | Van Ray Cousins | Pingree, ND 58476 | $570,671 |
4 | Meier Farms | Steele, ND 58482 | $333,605 |
5 | Miles Benz | Steele, ND 58482 | $284,837 |
6 | Robin Emmet Dewitz | Steele, ND 58482 | $260,303 |
7 | Whitman Ranch | Robinson, ND 58478 | $257,539 |
8 | Dean Stroh | Tappen, ND 58487 | $213,901 |
9 | R & C Mittleider Farms Inc | Tappen, ND 58487 | $208,201 |
10 | Bonnie Lee Fettig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $197,746 |
11 | Marvin Dean Bodvig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $195,921 |
12 | Double-r Potatoes Llp | Pingree, ND 58476 | $194,075 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $193,727 |
14 | Chase William Trautmann | Robinson, ND 58478 | $193,414 |
15 | Travis Allen Wolff | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $189,237 |
16 | James John Cusey | Steele, ND 58482 | $187,028 |
17 | Meredith Laree Cusey | Steele, ND 58482 | $187,027 |
18 | Hoyt Earl Wagner | Pettibone, ND 58475 | $186,177 |
19 | Wayne Dean Bodvig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $182,553 |
20 | Kevin A Falk | Tappen, ND 58487 | $180,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>