Market Gains in Kidder County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 99
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Kidder County, North Dakota totaled $427,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Allen Lee Almer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $1,485 |
42 | William Irvin Daniel | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $1,388 |
43 | David Flath | Robinson, ND 58478 | $1,302 |
44 | Wayne Dean Bodvig | Tappen, ND 58487 | $1,301 |
45 | Gerald Edwin Dewitz | Tappen, ND 58487 | $1,288 |
46 | Gary Eberl | Dawson, ND 58428 | $1,287 |
47 | Steven Lynn Weisenburger | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $1,161 |
48 | Travis Allen Wolff | Chaseley, ND 58423 | $1,124 |
49 | John A Schatz Sr | Steele, ND 58482 | $1,118 |
50 | Curtis Dean Haibeck | Steele, ND 58482 | $1,111 |
51 | Kendall Scott Haibeck | Steele, ND 58482 | $1,111 |
52 | Gary L Johnson | Steele, ND 58482 | $992 |
53 | Dwight Delayne Lachenmeier | Medina, ND 58467 | $974 |
54 | Alexander Bernard Fitterer | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $965 |
55 | Hal Conrad Sathre | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $960 |
56 | Michael Rohrich | Steele, ND 58482 | $914 |
57 | Norman Christof Bickel | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $900 |
58 | Mark Donald Weisenburger | Tuttle, ND 58488 | $784 |
59 | Gilbert Lang | Tappen, ND 58487 | $770 |
60 | David Dean Hagens | Steele, ND 58482 | $701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”