Farm Subsidy information
LaMoure County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in LaMoure County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 804
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in LaMoure County, North Dakota totaled $49,288,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clay Haugen | Litchville, ND 58461 | $207,863 |
22 | Fairview Hutterian Brethren Association | Lamoure, ND 58458 | $198,892 |
23 | Nitschke Brothers | Jud, ND 58454 | $183,172 |
24 | Francis James Huber | Jud, ND 58454 | $172,807 |
25 | Kyle John Anderson | Verona, ND 58490 | $171,137 |
26 | Jana Elizabeth Anderson | Verona, ND 58490 | $171,114 |
27 | Sandness Brothers | Gwinner, ND 58040 | $167,326 |
28 | Anw Farms | Montpelier, ND 58472 | $159,599 |
29 | Bruce William Shockman | Lamoure, ND 58458 | $158,003 |
30 | Wade Heinrich | Dickey, ND 58431 | $154,827 |
31 | M3 Incorporated | Dickey, ND 58431 | $150,692 |
32 | Michael Allen Vogel | Lamoure, ND 58458 | $144,588 |
33 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $142,585 |
34 | Richard E Long | Berlin, ND 58415 | $136,648 |
35 | Heartland State Bank ** | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $133,459 |
36 | Lonnie Ray Fregien | Jud, ND 58454 | $132,333 |
37 | Bryon E Thom | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $132,029 |
38 | Tige Matthew Kiecker | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $130,772 |
39 | Michael Holmgren | Kulm, ND 58456 | $129,131 |
40 | Timothy James Cuypers | Litchville, ND 58461 | $128,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”