Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Logan County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 394
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Logan County, North Dakota totaled $1,944,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Norman E Miller | Gackle, ND 58442 | $8,662 |
62 | Jack Theodore Erbele | Lehr, ND 58460 | $8,642 |
63 | Gordon Walth | Wishek, ND 58495 | $8,629 |
64 | Brian L Entzi | Fredonia, ND 58440 | $8,583 |
65 | Allen Foster | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $8,438 |
66 | Simon Piatz | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $8,399 |
67 | Ricky L Bader | Lehr, ND 58460 | $8,371 |
68 | Neal Owen Becker | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $8,321 |
69 | Paul Ackerman Estate | Wishek, ND 58495 | $8,238 |
70 | Francis James Wald | Linton, ND 58552 | $8,203 |
71 | Howard E Schultz | Fredonia, ND 58440 | $8,119 |
72 | Vernon Dean Burkle | Gackle, ND 58442 | $8,101 |
73 | Jonathan Jerome Burkle | Fredonia, ND 58440 | $8,100 |
74 | Daniel Wayne Rivinius | Streeter, ND 58483 | $8,035 |
75 | Robert William Weigel | Kintyre, ND 58549 | $8,035 |
76 | Albert Schumacher | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $7,990 |
77 | Steven G Kleingartner | Gackle, ND 58442 | $7,942 |
78 | Raymond Erbele | Streeter, ND 58483 | $7,865 |
79 | Ronald J Piatz | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $7,826 |
80 | Thomas Bernard Vandeberghe Estate | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $7,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”