Production Flexibility Program in McHenry County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,558
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in McHenry County, North Dakota totaled $27,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Raymond J Kuntz | Drake, ND 58736 | $57,731 |
142 | Lawrence Paulus | Drake, ND 58736 | $56,848 |
143 | Loren Duchsherer | Balfour, ND 58712 | $56,356 |
144 | Lyle Curtis Amon | Colorado Springs, CO 80907 | $56,107 |
145 | Jay Lemer | Drake, ND 58736 | $55,936 |
146 | Never Rest Ranch Inc | Towner, ND 58788 | $55,054 |
147 | William H Nitz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $55,034 |
148 | Bethke Brothers Partnership | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $54,738 |
149 | Ronald F Heizelman | Velva, ND 58790 | $54,522 |
150 | Harold Francis Bruner | Drake, ND 58736 | $54,113 |
151 | Victor John Matehs | Upham, ND 58789 | $54,007 |
152 | John J Keller | Minot, ND 58701 | $53,422 |
153 | Virgil H Hall | Upham, ND 58789 | $52,895 |
154 | Arlen Schiele | Balfour, ND 58712 | $52,859 |
155 | Verl Rodney Bakken | Velva, ND 58790 | $52,578 |
156 | Terry Lee Krumwiede | Voltaire, ND 58792 | $52,555 |
157 | David Paul Woodall | Granville, ND 58741 | $52,485 |
158 | Myron Blumhagen | Drake, ND 58736 | $52,062 |
159 | Robert Wayne Gjellstad | Velva, ND 58790 | $51,600 |
160 | Kenneth Victor Rudnick | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $51,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”