Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in McKenzie County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 438
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in McKenzie County, North Dakota totaled $12,591,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lance Sorenson | Keene, ND 58847 | $41,320 |
102 | Ty Rolfsrud | Keene, ND 58847 | $40,976 |
103 | Sean Forthun | Alexander, ND 58831 | $40,894 |
104 | Cross Bros Jv | Alexander, ND 58831 | $40,756 |
105 | David L Crighton | Sidney, MT 59270 | $40,703 |
106 | Leland Brothers Jv | Sidney, MT 59270 | $40,226 |
107 | Andrew H Bednarik | Cartwright, ND 58838 | $39,966 |
108 | Jay Transtrom | Arnegard, ND 58835 | $39,602 |
109 | Jay Lewis | Alexander, ND 58831 | $38,741 |
110 | Forrest Daniel Abelmann | Alexander, ND 58831 | $38,279 |
111 | Robert Irwin | Alexander, ND 58831 | $38,259 |
112 | Brandon Monson | Alexander, ND 58831 | $37,007 |
113 | John Kostelecky | Dickinson, ND 58602 | $36,848 |
114 | Bobbi Geiger | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $36,280 |
115 | Doug Gullikson | Cartwright, ND 58838 | $36,187 |
116 | Texas-red Enterprises Inc | Fairview, MT 59221 | $35,965 |
117 | Tate Mrachek | Alexander, ND 58831 | $35,732 |
118 | Lemoine Dennis Hartel | Watford City, ND 58854 | $34,546 |
119 | Lynn M Heiser | Watford City, ND 58854 | $33,420 |
120 | James Cross | Alexander, ND 58831 | $32,853 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”