Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in McKenzie County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 161
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in McKenzie County, North Dakota totaled $1,323,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daniel Wayne Dwyer | Arnegard, ND 58835 | $1,678 |
122 | Kevin Hartman | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $1,665 |
123 | Dale Winter | Redmond, WA 98052 | $1,628 |
124 | Robert Curtis Muri | Watford City, ND 58854 | $1,455 |
125 | David Winter | Cartwright, ND 58838 | $1,419 |
126 | Eunice Christophersen | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $1,384 |
127 | Robert Christophersen | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $1,384 |
128 | Lynn Dewhirst | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $1,336 |
129 | Ronald J Weber | Watford City, ND 58854 | $1,313 |
130 | Douglas L Olson | Keene, ND 58847 | $1,293 |
131 | Donald Link | Alexander, ND 58831 | $1,284 |
132 | Shawn Lee | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $1,215 |
133 | Conald J Havelka | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $1,050 |
134 | Eugene Dahl | Keene, ND 58847 | $975 |
135 | Donald Leiseth | Watford City, ND 58854 | $975 |
136 | Richard Jore | Watford City, ND 58854 | $962 |
137 | Dale Orf | Grassy Butte, ND 58634 | $956 |
138 | Ronald Metcalf | Sidney, MT 59270 | $893 |
139 | Forrest Daniel Abelmann | Alexander, ND 58831 | $889 |
140 | Timothy Abelmann | Alexander, ND 58831 | $889 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”