Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in McLean County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 277
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in McLean County, North Dakota totaled $396,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jerry M Kerzmann | Garrison, ND 58540 | $3,387 |
22 | Steve Swanson | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $3,332 |
23 | Durnell Klain | Ruso, ND 58778 | $3,083 |
24 | Tyrel Franklund | Wilton, ND 58579 | $3,069 |
25 | Alan Klain | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $3,020 |
26 | Bryon Lynn Fylling | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $2,904 |
27 | Cody L Wardner | Mercer, ND 58559 | $2,900 |
28 | Gerard Earl Goven | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $2,839 |
29 | Stuart Ternes | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $2,833 |
30 | Pablo Ronderos Jr | Washburn, ND 58577 | $2,789 |
31 | , | $2,764 | |
32 | Bradley Ronald Lagge | Garrison, ND 58540 | $2,705 |
33 | Michael Wilcox | Douglas, ND 58735 | $2,567 |
34 | Myron Edwin Lick | Ruso, ND 58778 | $2,547 |
35 | Nicholas Rhodes Faulkner | Ruso, ND 58778 | $2,547 |
36 | Mark Feist | Sawyer, ND 58781 | $2,546 |
37 | Tamera Clark | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $2,498 |
38 | Brent David Fast | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $2,489 |
39 | Wesley Lindteigen | Ruso, ND 58778 | $2,487 |
40 | Thomas Gust Kohler | Benedict, ND 58716 | $2,473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”