Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in McLean County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 277
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in McLean County, North Dakota totaled $396,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry Lee James | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $1,109 |
102 | Randal Elvin Striha | Butte, ND 58723 | $1,091 |
103 | Delvin C Kolden | Garrison, ND 58540 | $1,053 |
104 | Stuart Ostby | Douglas, ND 58735 | $1,049 |
105 | Ethan Fylling | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $1,044 |
106 | Corwin Kohler | Benedict, ND 58716 | $1,037 |
107 | Sheldon Jay Laib | Mercer, ND 58559 | $1,007 |
108 | Darnell Schilling | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $989 |
109 | Brian Bergquist | Wilton, ND 58579 | $980 |
110 | Morris E Miller | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $964 |
111 | Preston Scott Bauer | Velva, ND 58790 | $958 |
112 | Richard Edwin Britton Jr | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $940 |
113 | Grant Alan James | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $939 |
114 | Clayton Ruff | Underwood, ND 58576 | $935 |
115 | Kemp Bradley Makeeff | Mercer, ND 58559 | $933 |
116 | Rebecca Ann Makeeff | Mercer, ND 58559 | $933 |
117 | Tyrel Jerald Tweeten | Coleharbor, ND 58531 | $899 |
118 | Donald Carl Schmidt | Benedict, ND 58716 | $881 |
119 | Donald Flinn | Wilton, ND 58579 | $862 |
120 | Daniel Thomas Volochenko | Butte, ND 58723 | $848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”