Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in McLean County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 277
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in McLean County, North Dakota totaled $396,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Bryce Wade Hauf | Max, ND 58759 | $833 |
122 | Richard Ernest Philbrick | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $807 |
123 | Mark Fetzer | Max, ND 58759 | $804 |
124 | James Bryan Leroy | Underwood, ND 58576 | $789 |
125 | Kenneth Frank Grabinger | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $788 |
126 | Cory Grabinger | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $788 |
127 | Bruce Allen Matheny | Garrison, ND 58540 | $785 |
128 | Mark Flath | Coleharbor, ND 58531 | $777 |
129 | Richard Flath | Coleharbor, ND 58531 | $777 |
130 | Ronald Alec Wardner | Coleharbor, ND 58531 | $777 |
131 | Jamie Glen Guttormson | Velva, ND 58790 | $771 |
132 | Travis James Kolden | Ryder, ND 58779 | $769 |
133 | H Thomas Schulz | Washburn, ND 58577 | $769 |
134 | Tyler Kinn | Turtle Lake, ND 58575 | $768 |
135 | Harvey Rohrich | Washburn, ND 58577 | $767 |
136 | Dennis James Linnertz | Ryder, ND 58779 | $763 |
137 | Jarred Roger Billadeau | Ryder, ND 58779 | $719 |
138 | Layne Billadeau | Ryder, ND 58779 | $719 |
139 | Derrick Dean Kessler | Hazen, ND 58545 | $709 |
140 | Leann Marie Billadeau | Parshall, ND 58770 | $707 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”