Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 102
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marvin Sutheimer | Zap, ND 58580 | $4,404 |
22 | Garland Wiedrich | Hallock, MN 56728 | $4,139 |
23 | Coby Little Soldier | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,707 |
24 | Leona Brecht | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,636 |
25 | Robert Schriefer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,554 |
26 | Clarion Jacobsen | Roberts, MT 59070 | $3,540 |
27 | James Traxel | Dodge, ND 58625 | $3,526 |
28 | John Galster | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $3,500 |
29 | Reinhold Hauff | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,500 |
30 | Jerry Isaak | Dodge, ND 58625 | $3,500 |
31 | Armin O Hauser | Hebron, ND 58638 | $3,434 |
32 | Johnny Flemmer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,376 |
33 | Marc A Schriefer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,243 |
34 | Ivan Henke | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $3,038 |
35 | Bruce Darcy | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $2,432 |
36 | Dean Helling | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $2,298 |
37 | Jacob Gilbert Weigum | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $2,074 |
38 | Louisa Keller | Charlson, ND 58763 | $1,970 |
39 | Marvin John Faut | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $1,908 |
40 | Scott L Savelkoul | Stanton, ND 58571 | $1,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”